Are you found by AI? Log in Start free trial →

Research · market brief · August 2026

AI visibility tools, mapped: who measures what, at what price

Serious money has moved into measuring whether AI recommends you. Profound closed a US$96M Series C in February 2026 at a reported valuation near a billion dollars[1], Peec AI raised roughly US$29M in its first sixteen months[2], and Ahrefs and Semrush both shipped AI-visibility trackers into their suites[3]. That capital has built real products. What it has not changed is the quiet pattern in the pricing pages: at almost every price point, you are buying a slice of the answer-engine board, and the rest sits behind a higher tier.

What each published entry tier actually measures

Published pricing as read on 7 August 2026, links below so you can verify every cell at the source. Vendors change pricing; if a cell is out of date, tell us and we'll correct it.

ToolEntry priceEngines measured at that priceWhat sits behind a higher tier
Profound[4]US$99/moChatGPT onlyAdditional engines from US$399; enterprise reported at US$2,000+
Peec AI[5]~US$95/mo3 of 7 enginesClaude is enterprise-only on every published tier
Otterly.ai[6]US$29/mo4 enginesGemini, Claude and AI Mode sold as add-ons
Surfer[7]US$49/moNo AI tracker at this tierThe 25-prompt tracker starts at US$99/mo
Ahrefs Brand Radar[3]US$199/mo per platform1 platform per US$199All 6 platforms for US$699/mo, on top of a base Ahrefs plan
Are you found by AI?US$49/moAll 7 engines — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Google AI OverviewsNothing. One plan, the whole board, every week.

What buyers should check, whichever tool they pick

Four questions separate measurement from theatre, and they apply to us as much as anyone. Does the tool show you the verbatim answers behind every score, or only charts about them? How many engines are actually measured at your tier, as opposed to appearing in the marketing? Is every question asked more than once, so a single lucky answer can't pass as a trend? And can you re-ask the engine live from the report, so a number can be checked the moment you doubt it? Our whole method is open source[8], because a measurement you can't inspect is a claim, and this category has enough claims.

If you run an agency

Agencies reselling AI-visibility monitoring and remediation are charging clients US$500 to US$1,500 a month[9], and agencies are already among the heaviest users of our free scan. We're designing a partner tier: white-labeled reports, a multi-client console, wholesale pricing. Register interest and shape it.

We can't outspend a billion-dollar valuation. We can out-show it: every engine, every answer kept word for word, at the price the market treats as an entry ticket. Run the free scan and read what AI is telling your buyers today.

Method. Found by AI asks ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google's AI the questions real buyers ask for each category, then measures which businesses the engines actually name. Scores are 0–100 point-in-time measurements; the index re-scans and grows automatically. Businesses listed here were selected and measured by us from public directories — scan your own site free to see where you'd rank. Queries and methodology are open: github.com/techhorizonlabs.